Give most accurate response. A enters by night a house which he is legally entitled to enter. Z in good faith, taking A for a housebreaker, attacks A and causes injury. In this case :

A. Since A was legally entitled to enter the house, Z would be liable for voluntarily causing hurt to A.
B. Z will be liable because he has acted in haste without exercising proper care and attention to ascertain whether A was an inhabitant or a house-breaker.
C. Z will not be liable because he has acted under a mistaken belief that A was a burglar.
D. Z will not be liable because he has acted in the exercise of his right of private defence of property under a misconception that A was a house-breaker.
✅ The correct answer is option D.

A is attacked by mob who attempts to murder him. He cannot effectually exercise his right of P.D. without firing on the mob and without taking risk of the life of children mingled in the mob:

A. A did not commit offence if by firing he harms children.
B. A is guilty if by firing he harm children without recourse to the police authorities.
C. A is guilty of firing causes harms to children.
D. None of the above.
✅ The correct answer is option A.

The right of P.D. against an assault which reasonable cause the apprehension of death extends to :

A. Cause harm to innocent person if he cannot effectively exercise right of P.D. without taking risk of harming innocent person.
B. Cause harm to innocent person.
C. Cause harm to the innocent person., if he suspect him to be assaulter.
D. None of the above.
✅ The correct answer is option A.

For abetment by conspiracy

A. A mere agreement between to or more persons to do an unlawful act is enough
B. Some act or illegal omission must take place in pursuance of an engagement between two or more persons to do an unlawful act.
C. There must be an intentional aid by one person to another for the doing of an offence.
D. None of the above
✅ The correct answer is option B.

A person followed up purporting to be those of their stolen cattle’s and proceeded to villages of thieves and fired on them. He pleaded the right of P.D.

A. He is entitled to the benefit of right of P.D. of property.
B. He is not entitled as he did not recourse to the public authorities.
C. He is not entitled as the defence has been put to on end by successful retreat of the thieves.
D. None of the above.
✅ The correct answer is option C.