The father of the accused was attacked by the deceased and suffered a simple injury on his head, the accused in order to protect his father administered a fatal below on the chest of deceased with Ballam

A. The accused has no right of P.D..
B. The accused has the right of P.D..
C. Although accused has the right of P.D. he had exceeded it.
D. None of the above.
✅ The correct answer is option C.

Some person, lawful tenant of Agriculture land having reasonable fear of being ejected by force, made a practice of keeping their clubs in readiness. They expected attack and one of them was killed in the fray.

A. Attackers are entitled to the right of P.D.
B. Tenants are entitled to the benefit of right of Private defence.
C. Both tenants and attacks can avail the right of private defence.
D. Tenants are not entitled to the benefit as they were prepared to anticipated any attacks.
✅ The correct answer is option B.

A person run away from a hotel without paying bill, he was caught by servants. In this course he killed one of the hotel servants. He took the plea of private defense.

A. He is not entitled to the right of P.D. as a person cannot take advantage.
B. He is entitled as right of PD extends to the causing of death against the assault of abduction.
C. Cannot say.
D. None of the above.
✅ The correct answer is option A.