UPSC

A. each of such person is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone.

B. each of such persons is liable for that act.

C. each of such person is liable according to their guilt.

D. None of the above.

A. Same intention.

B. Common intention.

C. Both (a) and (b).

D. None of the above.

A. Where each of the several persons did something criminal, all acting in furtherance of the common intention, each was punishable for what he had done as if he had done it by himself.

B. Where an act is done by several persons each one of them shall be jointly liable for any act done by any one of them provided their intention was same and they have acted jointly.

C. Section 34 deals with the doing of several acts, similar or diverse by several persons ; if all are done in furtherance of the common intention of all each of such persons is liable for the result of them all, as if he had done them himself.

D. For joint liability under section 34 it would not be sufficient to show that the intention of the persons committing the crime was same or similar but it has also to be shown that they have acted jointly in furtherance of such intention.

A. Sec. 34 does create a substantive offence.

B. Sec. 34 is only a rule of evidence.

C. Both (a) and (b).

D. None of the above.

A. All accused are guilty of causing death.

B. This Sec. does not apply in this case.

C. All accused are guilty of causing death without invoking Sec. 34.

D. None of them is liable for the offence of murder.

A. All of them leaving D are guilty of murder.

B. All of them (A,B,C&D) are guilty of causing death.

C. Only A & B are guilty of murder.

D. None of the above.

A. Similar intention

B. Pre-arranged planning

C. Presence of planning

D. Presence of common knowledge.

A. A can be tried either in Korea or in England because the murderer was a Korean and the victim was a national of England.

B. A can be prosecuted in India in any place where he is found because Section 4 of the I.P.C. provides this the provisions of the code apply to any offence committed by any person on any ship or aircraft registered in India.

C. A cannot be prosecuted in India because the offence has not been committed against an Indian citizen.

D. A can only be prosecuted in Korea because only that country of which an offender is a national has jurisdiction to prosecute.

A. As if it was done by each one of them in singular capacity

B. Only for the part each one has done

C. For the abetment of the act

D. For an attempt to commit the act.

A. That whereas in Section 34 there must be at least five persons, Section 149 required only two persons.

B. That Section 149 is only a rule of evidence whereas Section 34 creates a specific offence and provides for its punishment.

C. That Section 34 requires active participation in action whereas Section 149 requires mere passive membership of the unlawful assembly

D. None of the above