UPSC

A. Son is not entitled as right of P.D. is available against the offence affecting one’s own body.

B. Son is not entitled to the benefit of this Sec. 96.

C. Son is entitled to the benefit.

D. Cannot say.

A. The intended victim as well as that person has the right of P.D..

B. The intended victim has the right of private defence.

C. That other person has the right of P.D.

D. Neither intended victim nor that person is entitled to the right of P.D.

A. Acts of theft and robbery.

B. Acts of theft, mischief and criminal.

C. Acts — thefts, robbery, mischief.

D. Acts of theft, robbery, mischief and criminal trespass.

A. A, in good faith, for his child’s benefit, has his child cut for the stone by a surgeon knowing it to be likely that the operation will cause the child’s death but not intending to cause the child’s death.

B. A, in good faith, for his child’s pecuniary benefit emasculates his child.

C. A confines his child for its benefit.

D. A whips his child moderately for the child’s benefit

A. A is not within the exception.

B. A is within the exception.

C. Although A is not within the exception.

D. but he did not commit the offence.

A. Act must be done in good faith and without ay intention to cause death or to cause any harm as may result in death.

B. Act must be done with the consent of the sufferer whether consent is express or implied.

C. Act must be done in good faith and without intention to cause death though it might have been done with the intention such harm as may result in death.

D. The act done must be for the benefit of the person who suffers injury.

A. He is not entitled as such vadhya can hardly be said to act in good faith.

B. He is entitled to get benefit because he knows that it is likely to cause his death.

C. He is not entitled to the benefit because he knows that it is likely to cause his death.

D. None of the above.

A. At least 12 years.

B. At least 18 years.

C. At least 10 years.

D. At least 7 years.

A. They are guilty of causing death.

B. They are not entitled to get benefit of Sec. 88.

C. They are entitled to get benefit.

D. They are guilty of causing death.

A. A is liable because he knew or had reasons to believe that fall was very likely to result in the death of the child.

B. A is liable because A’s act cannot be said to have been done in good faith in as much as he kne that the boy was very likely to be killed by such fall, even then he did not take precautions to save him.

C. A has committed no offence, because A dropped the child to save him from being killed by fire, the act being done in good faith and intending child’s benefit without any intention to harm him.

D. A is not liable because he had no intention to kill and no person can be held liable for homicide in absence of such intention.