A. the owner / freeholder

B. head landlord

C. agent receiving rent

D. all the above

A. oakley v. wilson

B. barker v. levinson

C. both (a) & (b)

D. none of the above

A. a person is given a part of the premises on license

B. the person is not the member of the family of the licensor

C. the licensor also resides in the premises

D. all the above

A. empeegee portfolio services pvt. ltd. v. sharada navinchandra shah

B. kamalabai laxman mutraj v. bherumal verimal haran

C. in both (a) & (b)

D. in none of the above

A. true statement

B. partially true

C. false statement

D. in some cases

A. yes always

B. no

C. only when landlord has carried out structural repairs

D. occasionally

A. to bring uniformity in rents

B. for deciding local tax rates

C. to provide remedy to weaker sections of tenants against exploitation by the landlord

D. to help state government in revenue collection

A. can file an appeal u/s 257 of the code

B. can file a civil suit

C. both (a) & (b)

D. no appeal lies

A. akin to the powers of review under civil procedure code

B. can be invoked only if the circumstances mentioned therein are satisfied

C. both (a) & (b)

D. very wide

A. does not have power to review

B. does not have jurisdiction to review

C. can review only with prior permission from the superior authorities/ officers

D. all the above