A. Medical insanity and legal insanity under Sec. 84 are different.

B. Medical, insanity and legal insanity under Sec. 84 are same thing.

C. Legal insanity under Se. 84 meant the person’s consciousness of the bearing of his acts on those affected by it.

D. Both (b) and (c).

A. Is entitled as he was annoyed.

B. Is entitled as he was suffering from decease.

C. Is not entitled to the benefit of Sec. 84 because he knows the nature of act.

D. Is entitled as he did not know the nature of act.

A. That the thing which intoxicated him was administered to him without his knowledge or against his will.

B. That at the time of doing it he was in such state of intoxication that he was unable to know the nature of his acts.

C. Both (a) and (b).

D. None of the above.

A. Delirium Tremens.

B. Where a specific intent is an essential element of an offence.

C. Both (a) and (b).

D. None of the above.

A. Accused is entitled to the benefit of Sec. 85 because drunkenness is excuse in every case.

B. Accused is entitled to the benefit of Sec. 85.

C. Accused is not entitled to the benefit of Sec. 85.

D. Cannot say.

A. Is guilty of rape and murder unless it is established that at the time doing he was so drunk that he

B. Is guilty of murder only.

C. Is guilty of rape only.

D. Is not guilty of rape any offence.

A. Guilty of Culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

B. Guilty of murder.

C. Entitled to the benefit of Sec. 85.

D. Not of these.

A. 86 protect to assume specific intent.

B. Sec. 86 does not say any thing to assume knowledge on the part of accused.

C. Both (a) and (b).

D. None of the above.

A. Is guilty of murder.

B. Is entitled to get benefit under Sec. 84.

C. Is not entitled to get such benefit.

D. None of the above.

A. Act must be done by a person of unsound mind.

B. Such person must be incapable of knowing : (i) the nature of the act, or (ii) that the act was contrary to law, or (iii) that the act was wrong.

C. A person must be suffering from some defect of reason whether it is because of some disease of mind or otherwise at the time of commission of the crime.

D. Incapacity must be by reason of unsoundness of mind of the offender and incapacity must exist at the time of doing of the act constituting the offence.